PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 90 of 2026 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 90 of 2026 Pateshwari Prasad Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daya Shankar Tiwari, Aditya Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Upon the case being called out, Shri Anurag Dwivedi, Advocate had requested adjournment of the case on the ground that Shri Daya Shankar Tiwari, one of the two learned counsel for the petitioner, is out of station. 2. Upon being asked as to why Shri Aditya Pandey is not present in the Court, he states that he has no idea about reason of his absence. 3. On 12.02.2026, the following order was passed by this Court :- "1. Sri Daya Shankar Tiwari, one of the two learned counsel for the petitioner has sent an out of station slip and the other learned counsel Sri Aditya Pandey is not present in the Court and no request for adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf. 2. Sri Dheeraj Ojha, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P., Sri Talib Khan holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta, the le