Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 172 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 172 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 172 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 172 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Kashyap .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra, Shailendra Singh Chauhan Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Power filed today by Sri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party no. 3 (L.D.A.) is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam says that the Nagar Nigam tried to remove the encroachment on public road but on account of resistance by the local residents was unsuccessful because there was no assisted by police personnel. 4. Let the concerned officials of the Municipal Corporation request the concerned D.C.P. for providing adequate police assistance for removal of encroachment and then do the needful after assessing the situation, unless there is any legal impediment in the form of any stay order of any court etc. If nothing happens within one month, it shall be open for the petitioner to

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 172 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam