Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 168 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 168 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 168 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 168 of 2026 Pankaj Bhaiya .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and 2 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kundan Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Harshit Pandey, Jagdish Pathak (S.C.) Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner questioning the decision of the Nagar Palika Parishad, Basti to set up a statue on Ranjeet Chauraha. 2. Submissions have been made that the width of the road is too narrow to set up the statue at the Chauraha and the concerned Circle Officer (Traffic) has already indicated that the location is not appropriate. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Nagar Palika Parishad has produced an Office Order dated 21.01.2026, copy whereof has been sent to the petitioner also, inter alia indicating that the work relating to installation of statue at the concerned Chauraha has been suspended and for reconsideration, the same would be taken up in the next Board meeting. 4. In view of the above fact-situation wherein, presently, the respondents have suspended the work relating to insta

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 168 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam