PROSECUTRIX (X) vs STATE & ANR

* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: February 07, 2026 % Pronounced on: February 17, 2026 CRL.REV.P. 630/2017 PROSECUTRIX (X) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma and Ms. Anisha P. Das, Das, Advs. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Ashish Mahani, Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. Mr. Akshay Chandra, Mr. Bharat Sharma, Mr. Durga Dass Vashit and Ms. Viapsana Bubna, Advs. for R-2 alongwith the respondent no.2 SI- Jag Roshni, PS: Timarpur CRL.REV.P. 648/2017 STATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Ashish Mahani, Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. SI- Jag Roshni, PS: Timarpur Versus SUMIT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Chandra, Mr. Bharat Sharma, Mr. Durga Dass Vashit and Ms. Viapsana Bubna, Advs. alongwith the respondent CRL. REV. P. 630/2017 & CRL. REV. P. 648/2017 1. By virtue of the present petitions, filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner/ complainant/ prosecutrix2 as also the State, seek setting aside of the