PROSECUTRIX (X) vs STATE & ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: February 07, 2026 % Pronounced on: February 17, 2026 + CRL.REV.P. 630/2017 PROSECUTRIX (X) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma and Ms. Anisha P. Das, Das, Advs. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Ashish Mahani, Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. Mr. Akshay Chandra, Mr. Bharat Sharma, Mr. Durga Dass Vashit and Ms. Viapsana Bubna, Advs. for R-2 alongwith the respondent no.2 SI- Jag Roshni, PS: Timarpur + CRL.REV.P. 648/2017 STATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Ashish Mahani, Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. SI- Jag Roshni, PS: Timarpur Versus SUMIT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Chandra, Mr. Bharat Sharma, Mr. Durga Dass Vashit and Ms. Viapsana Bubna, Advs. alongwith the respondent CRL. REV. P. 630/2017 & CRL. REV. P. 648/2017 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:17.02.2026 15:45:50 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. By virtue of the present petitions, filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner/ complainant/ prosecutrix2 as also the State, seek setting aside of the impugned order dated 31.05.2017 passed by the learned ASJ/ SFTC-02 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi3, whereby the accused/ respondent no.2/ respondent4 was discharged of the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 18605 arising out of FIR No.923/2015 dated 01.12.2015 registered at PS.: Timarpur, Delhi. 2. Since both petitions are arising from the very same impugned order dated 31.05.2017 and pertain to the same set of facts,