Delhi High Court · 2026-02-04
PREETI SHARMA vs ANUJ SHARMA
- Citation / case number
- CRL.REV.P.-950/2017 2026:DHC:914
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- PREETI SHARMA
- Respondent
- ANUJ SHARMA
Judgment text excerpt
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 11.11.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 04.02.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 04.02.2026 + CRL.REV.P. 950/2017 PREETI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ankita Patnaik (DHCLSC) versus ANUJ SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Ms. Tripta Negi Singh, Ms. Ayushi Jain and Ms. Divyanshi Singh, Advocates. + CRL.REV.P. 295/2021 PREETI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ankita Patnaik (DHCLSC) versus ANUJ SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Ms. Tripta Negi Singh, Ms. Ayushi Jain and Ms. Divyanshi Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT CRL.REV.P. 950/2017 & connected matter Page 1 of 25 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:04.02.2026 18:33:41 DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. By way of the revision petition bearing no. 950/2017, the petitioner (divorced wife of the respondent) is seeking setting aside of the impugned judgment dated 12.07.2017, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, East District, Vishwas Nagar, Delhi [hereafter „Family Court‟], in CC No. 148/2014; and by way of revision petition bearing no. 295/2021, she seeks setting aside of the judgment dated 06.04.2021 passed in Ex/CRL. 375/2018 in CC No. 148/2014. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the petitioner was married to the respondent on 09.02.1999. According to the petitioner, soon after the marriage, she was subjected to harassment by the respondent and his family members. In these circumstances, the petitioner filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [hereafter „Cr.P.C.‟], being MP No. 416A/2003. Vide order dated 23.10.2004, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court,