PAWAN KUMAR vs SANDEEP GOEL

Judgment text excerpt

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2026 + CM(M) 252/2026 PAWAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pallav Arora and Mr. Apoorv Kataria, Advocates. versus SANDEEP GOEL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Mr. Imran Khan, Ms. Jahanvi Garg and Ms. Aarushi Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CAV 57/2026 2. As the learned Counsel for the Respondent has appeared, the Caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 7013/2026 (for condonation of delay) 3. The present application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking condonation of delay of 18 days in refiling the present petition. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 18 days in refiling the present petition is condoned and the application is disposed of. Signature Not Verified Signed By:MANISHA CM(M) 252/2026 Page 1 of 4 RAJPUT Signing Date:03.02.2026 11:11:24 CM APPL. 7012/2026 (for exemption) 5. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM(M) 252/2026 & CM APPL. 7011/2026 6. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 13th December, 2025, passed by the trial court in case bearing no. RC ARC 491/24, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order VIII Rule 1A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for placing on record additional documents has been dismissed. 7. Learned Counsel for the respondent appeared on advance notice and accepts notice. 8. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the matter is he