PAWAN KUMAR GOEL vs DR. DHAN SINGH & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 11.02.2026 Judgment delivered on: 17.02.2026 CS(COMM) 672/2022, CC(COMM) 16/2023 & I.A. 13948/2023 PAWAN KUMAR GOEL .....Plaintiff versus DR. DHAN SINGH & ANR. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff : Mr. Nalin Kohli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Ranjan, Mr. Anshul Malik and Mr. Sarath J. Bakash, Advocates. For the Defendants : Mr. Vaibhav Vutts, Ms. Aamna Hasan, Ms. Anupriya Shayam, Ms. Aarya Deshmukh and Ms. Vaibavi S.G., Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. 1. The present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction for infringement of Indian Patent 369150 (hereafter referred to as “suit patent”) for the process of extraction of Alpha Yohimbine with purity greater than 90% from Rauwolfia canescens/tetraphylla. The plaintiff also seeks for the delivery up of all stocks, rendition of account, damages, and costs for infringement of the plaintiff’s right in the suit patent. 2. Mr. Nalin Kohli, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 672/2022 Page 1 of 10 Digitally Signed By:YASHRAJ Signing Date:17.02.2026 14:59:19 plaintiff, at the outset on instructions, gave a statement that the plaintiff is willing to withdraw the present suit in terms of the affidavit dated 21.07.2025 filed in compliance of the order dated 15.07.2025. For the purpose of clarification and impact of the averment, the affidavit dated 21.07.2025 has been reproduced hereunder: “ AFFIDAVIT I, Pawan Kumar Goel, owner of Patent Number Indian patent 369150 and the Plaintiffin the present suit, do hereby state that: 1. I filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction for infringement of