PAWAN KUMAR GOEL vs DR. DHAN SINGH & ANR.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 11.02.2026 Judgment delivered on: 17.02.2026 CS(COMM) 672/2022, CC(COMM) 16/2023 & I.A. 13948/2023 PAWAN KUMAR GOEL .....Plaintiff versus DR. DHAN SINGH & ANR. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff : Mr. Nalin Kohli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Ranjan, Mr. Anshul Malik and Mr. Sarath J. Bakash, Advocates. For the Defendants : Mr. Vaibhav Vutts, Ms. Aamna Hasan, Ms. Anupriya Shayam, Ms. Aarya Deshmukh and Ms. Vaibavi S.G., Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. 1. The present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction for infringement of Indian Patent 369150 (hereafter referred to as “suit patent”) for the process of extraction of Alpha Yohimbine with purity greater than 90% from Rauwolfia canescens/tetraphylla. The plaintiff also seeks for the delivery up of all stocks, rendition of account, damages, and costs for infringement of the plaintiff’s right in the suit patent. 2. Mr. Nalin Kohli, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the 2025. For the purpose of clarification and impact of the averme