Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-04

PARVEEN TANEJA vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
CRL.A.-251/2025 2026:DHC:987-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PARVEEN TANEJA
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 4th February, 2026 Uploaded on: 6th February, 2026. CRL.A. 251/2025 PARVEEN TANEJA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan (DHCLSC), Mr. Hitain Bajaj, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with Ms. Divya Yadav and Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advs. with Dr. R.S. Gupta SI Satish Chandra CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.A. 251/2025 2. On the last date of hearing i.e., 12th January, 2026, this Court had referred to the orders passed by the Supreme Court in ‘Kaushal Singh vs. The State of Rajasthan’ 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1473, as also in Criminal Appeal No. 632/2022 titled ‘Jagjeet Singh & Ors. v. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr., wherein the Court had considered that the details of criminal antecedents of the persons seeking bail are required to be furnished. In the said context, this Court has observed as under: “10. When convicts are seeking suspension of sentence/bail, repeatedly, adjournments are being sought, as the information concerning criminal antecedents is not readily available. 11