MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI vs G.DSOUZA AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

1/33 902-J-WP-1047-2021.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1047 OF 2021 Municipal Corporation of Greater .. Petitioner Mumbai Through the Municipal Commissioner Mahapalika Marg, Fort, Mumbai 400001 Versus 1. G.D’souza .. Respondents Adult, Occupation: R/at: P.O. Box 8476, Mumbai 400 103 2. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone V Mumbai 400 025 … Mr.Yashodeep Deshmukh a/w Ms.Jyoti Mhatre i/b Ms.Komal Punjabi for the Petitioner. Mr.Manish Tomar for Respondent No.1. Ms.P.H. Kantharia, Government Pleader a/w Ms.Jyoti Chavan, Addl. GP for the State- Respondent No.2. Mr.Vinod Shinde, Sub. Engineer Roads City, MCGM, present. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY, 2026. JUDGMENT (PER BHARATI DANGRE, J) :- 1 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, (hereinafter, referred to as “MCGM”), being aggrieved by the order passed by the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred Tilak 2/33 902-J-WP-1047-2021.doc to as ‘Commission’) on 19/1/2018 in MAS No.995/2016, thereby making recommendations, in Complaint case No.995/2016 filed at the instance of respondent no.2, has approached this Court by invoking the writ jurisdiction being seeking quashing and setting aside of the said order as bad-in-law and passed exceeding its jurisdiction. The petition also sought stay to the effect, operation implementation of the impugned order. While issuing notice to the respondents on 22/3/2018, this Court had stayed the effect and operation of the impugned order to the extent of direction contained in paragraph no. 6B, and the order continued to remain in force. 2 We have heard learned counsel Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh for the petitioner. The petition has impleaded the complainant Mr.G.B.