Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-17

MR. ANISH vs STATE THROUGH SHO GTB ENCLAVE

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-4792/2024 2026:DHC:1352
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MR. ANISH
Respondent
STATE THROUGH SHO GTB ENCLAVE

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 17.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4792/2024 ANISH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Kumar Saxena, Mr. Vijayant Sharma and Mr. I.K. Khare, Advocates versus STATE THROUGH SHO GTB ENCLAVE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/Inspector Ashwini, PS GTB Enclave CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 56/2018 of PS GTB Enclave for offence under Section 302/392/397/411/201/34 IPC. 2. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case started from a blind FIR registered on statement of one Sati Ram, brother of the deceased, according to which, on 09.02.2018 at about 10:35 am, the deceased on his scooty was transporting 50 kg copper in a white bag, and at about 11:00 am he came to know that the deceased had been stabbed and had been taken to GTB Hospital. On reaching the hospital, he was informed by the deceased that BAIL APPLN. 4792/2024 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, Signature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2026.02.17 18:10:16 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:17.02.2026 18:33:23 two unknown boys had snatched the copper and one of them stabbed him due to which he lost consciousness and those boys fled. After investigation, the police arrested the accused/applicant and his co-accused Sonu. 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant contends that there is no admissible evidence against the accused/applicant and he

MR. ANISH vs STATE THROUGH SHO GTB ENCLAVE · Niyam