MOUNTAIN VALLEY SPRINGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs BABY FOREST AYURVEDA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S LANDSMILL HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED) & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 19.01.2026 Pronounced on: 27.02.2026 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 111/2024 & CM APPL. 33733/2024, CM APPL. 33736/2024 MOUNTAIN VALLEY SPRINGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Essenese Obhan, Mr.Neel Mason, Ms.Ayesha Guhathakurta and Ms.Urvika Aggarwal, Advs. versus BABY FOREST AYURVEDA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S LANDSMILL HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sundeep Chatterjee, Mr.Rohan Swarup, Ms.Tanya Arora, Ms.Aastha Verma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 15.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A. 14373/2023 and I.A.21648/2023 in CS (COMM) 523/2023, titled Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed FAO(OS)(COMM) 111/2024 Page 1 of 31 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:27.02.2026 16:27:10 Mountain Valley Springs India Private Limited v. Baby Forest Ayurveda Private Limited (formerly known as M/S Landsmill Healthcare Private Limited), whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the said applications filed by the appellant under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, ‘CPC’) and refused an interim order of injunction against the respondents herein for restraining them from using the mark ‘BABY FOREST’ and ‘BABY FOREST-SOHAM OF AYUVEDA’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Challenged Marks’). 2. It is pertinent to mention that, by an undertaking given to the Court on 04.08.2023 in I.A. 14373/2023, the respondents agreed not use the marks ‘SAUNDARYA’ and ‘BABY ESSENTIALS’. Consequently, the controversy stood confined to the Challeng