MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3 of 2026 Mohammad Arif …..Petitioners(s) Versus Laiq Ahmad …..Respondents(s) Counsel for Petitioners(s) : Rama Goel Bansal, Shalini Goel Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rupesh Srivastav Court No. - 35 AFR HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Ms Rama Goel Bansal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rupesh Srivastav, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India calls in question the orders dated 03.09.2025 and 09.10.2025 passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court, Bareilly in SCC Suit No. 6 of 2019, as also the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Bareilly in Misc. Civil Case No. 397 of 2025, whereby the revision preferred by the petitioner under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act came to be dismissed as not maintainable. 3. The dispute has its genesis in SCC Suit No. 6 of 2019 instituted by the respondent–plaintiff seeking eviction of the petitioner–defendant from a shop situated at Meena Bazar, Mohalla Tanda, near Imambara Baheri, District Bareilly. The plaintiff asserted his ownership over the pr