Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-02-16

MAHESH PURSHOTTAM MAURYA THROUGH THE CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR.SUKHARILAL SAROJ AND ORS vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS

Citation / case number
FA/70/2012
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
MAHESH PURSHOTTAM MAURYA THROUGH THE CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR.SUKHARILAL SAROJ AND ORS
Respondent
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

ppn 1 46.fa-70.12(j).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 1. Mahesh Purshottam Maurya of Mumbai, aged about 60 years, Occupation : Landlord, Indian Inhabitant, residing at SJK Near Nair Wadi, Saki Naka Kherani Road, Mumbai – 400 072 through the Constituted Attorney Mr. Sukharilal Saroj also of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant residing at SJK Compound, Survey No.41, C.T.S. No.156 (Part) of Village Mohili Saki Naka, Mumbai – 400 072 2. Radheshyam B. Kanojia 3. Jayram S. Saroj 4. Jamaluddin Khan of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitants, residing at SJK Compound, C.T.S. No.156, Village Mohili, Revenue Village: Saki Saki Naka, Mumbai – 400 072 ….Appellants (Org. Plaintiff Nos.1 to 3 & 5) Versus 1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Corporate Body duly incorporated under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, having its Head office at Mahapalika Building, Mahapalika Marg Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 2. Akram Hussain ppn 2 46.fa-70.12(j).doc 3. Shankar Chauhan 4. Shamshuddin Khan of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitants, residing at SJK Compound, C.T.S. No.156, Village Mohili, Revenue Village: Saki Saki Naka, Mumbai – 400 072 .…Respondents (Org. Defendants and Plaintiff Nos.4, 6 & 7) ---- Mr. R. R