Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-27

M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED) vs M/S SUN CORP & ORS.

Citation / case number
ARB.P.-1022/2025 2026:DHC:1814
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED)
Respondent
M/S SUN CORP & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27.02.2026 ARB.P. 1022/2025 M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshal Kumar, Advocate. versus M/S SUN CORP & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Mr. Vikrant Kumar and Mr. Amar Bajpayee, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes that are stated to have arisen inter se the parties arising out of the Clause 20 as set out in Hypothecation/Loan Agreement dated 02.03.2015. The said clause reads as follows: “20. Any conflict, difference, controversies, or disputes arising between the parties, if not resolved mutually, shall be submitted/referred to the arbitration of the Sole Arbitrator. The notices like Demand Notice, Loan Recall - cum - Demand Notice and/or telephonic conversations/ mails shall be deemed to be sufficient proof for opportunity given to the Borrower and/ or Guarantor(s) for re