M/S AJUNI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH. KULJEET SINGH vs MR. ARSH MOHAMMAD & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 18th February, 2026 Judgment pronounced on: 25th February, 2026 + CS(COMM) 69/2023 with I.A. 39590/2024 and I.A. 30226/2025 M/S AJUNI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH. KULJEET SINGH .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Mr. Mayank Rustagi and Ms. Anjali Pandey, Advocates. versus MR. ARSH MOHAMMAD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate for D-1. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL JUDGMENT AMIT BANSAL, J. I.A. 30226/2025 (seeking condonation of delay in filing the written synopsis as directed vide order dated 20.08.2025) 1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the defendant no.1 seeking condonation of delay of 75 days in filing written synopsis. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 75 days in filing the written synopsis on behalf of the defendant no.1 is condoned. 3. The application stands disposed of. I.A. 39590/2024 (under Order XIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) 4. The present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeking recovery of Rs. 4,23,34,250/- along with interest @ 18% and costs. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(COMM) 69/2023 Page 1 of 11 By:VIVEK MISHRA Signing Date:25.02.2026 17:20:50 5. The captioned application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter ‘CPC’), as applicable to commercial disputes, seeking a summary judgment against the defendant no.1. CASE SETUP IN THE PLAINT 6. Brief facts stated in the plaint which are relevant for adjudication of the captioned application are set out below: 6.1. The plaintiff is a company primarily engaged in the trade of electronic goods such as mobile phones and its parts and acce