Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-16

LOTUS HERBALS PRIVATE LIMITED vs DPKA UNIVERSAL CONSUMER VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

Citation / case number
FAO(OS) (COMM)-45/2024 2026:DHC:1300-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
LOTUS HERBALS PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
DPKA UNIVERSAL CONSUMER VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 18.12.2025 Judgment delivered on: 16.02.2026 Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature + FAO(OS) (COMM) 45/2024 LOTUS HERBALS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... APPELLANT versus DPKA UNIVERSAL CONSUMER VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Vutts, Ms. Aamna Hasan, Ms. Aarya Deshmukh and Ms. Vaibhavi SG, Ms. Annanya Mehan, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Ameet Naik, Mr. Dhruv Anand, Ms. Madhu Chaudhary, Ms. Udita Patra, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Ms. Nimrat Singh, Mr. Dhananjay Khanna, Ms. Bhavya Verma, Advocates for R1 & R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 35 days in filing reply of the respondents in compliance of order dated 12.03.2024, is condoned. 2. The application is disposed of. CM APPL. 25783/2024 3. For the reasons stated in the application, we allow this application and treat their reply to the appeal as their