LINK INFRATECH PVT LTD. vs EMINENT INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12.02.2026 + ARB.P. 83/2026 LINK INFRATECH PVT LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus EMINENT INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vasu Goyal, Advocate for R-1. 3 + ARB.P. 212/2026 LINK INFRATECH PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus EMINENT INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vasu Goyal, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The present Petitions, filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seek the appointment of an independent Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties in relation to Blocks „J‟ and „K‟, arising out of the Letters of Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:14.02.2026 ARB.P. 83/2026 & connected matter Page 1 of 7 13:27:56 Intent dated 18.10.2010 and 22.09.2010 [“Agreements”]. 2. The said Agreements contain identical arbitration clauses, set out in Clause 5.8.6 thereof, which read as follows: “5.8.6. ARBITRATION. All question or disputes or differences, claim, right, mat er or thing whatsoever in any way arising out of or relating to this contract or the conditions thereof otherwise concerning the works or the execution or failure to execute the same, whether arising during the progress of the work or after the completion or abandonment or breach of the Contract hereof except the excepted matters as per clause 5.8.5 of this agreement shall be referred to the Arbitration and final decision of a single Arbitrator being a fellow of Indian Institute of Engineers or Indian Institute of Consultant or on the CPWD panel of Arb