LALIT KUMAR vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Judgment text excerpt

* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: January 13, 2026 % Pronounced on: February 18, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 6229/2022 LALIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aashul Aggarwal and Mr. Yogesh Panwar, Advs. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuram S. Sharma, SPP for CBI alongwith Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Mr. Vashisht Rao, Mr. Ripudaman Sharma, Ms. Riya Sachdeva and Ms. Amisha, Advs. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. By way of the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure1, the petitioner seek setting aside of the order dated 07.09.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)-07, Rouse Avenue Court, New Delhi2 in CC No.375/2019 whereby charges were framed against the petitioner under Section 120B read with Sections 420/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code3 and under Section 13(2) read with 1 Hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’ 2 Hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial Court’. 3 Hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’. CRL.M.C. 6229/2022 Page 1 of 17 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:18.02.2026 02:51:11 Section13(1)(d) of the Prevention of corruption Act4. 2. Briefly encapsulated, based on a written complaint of the Deputy General Manager, Corporation Bank, Zonal Office, Delhi (South)5, an FIR bearing no. RC-09/A/2017 dated 21.06.2017 came to be registered wherein it was alleged that in March 2013, one Sumit Mittal, projecting himself to be the proprietor of M/s. Shree Balaji Overseas6, approached the Bank seeking working capital finance of Rs.600 lakhs. The said loan proposal was sanctioned by the Bank on 19.04.2013, stipulating hypothecation of stock-in- trade and EMG of property bearing no.A-68, measuring 138.17 sq. mtrs., situated at Pushpa