Delhi High Court · 2026-02-10
KUSUM ROADWAYS vs HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- CRL.M.C.-1144/2026 2026:DHC:1120
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- KUSUM ROADWAYS
- Respondent
- HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~67 & 68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 10th February, 2026 CRL.M.C. 1144/2026 & CRL.M.A.4553/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4554/2026 KUSUM ROADWAYS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.S. Chauhan with Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Mr. Divyanhu and Mrs. A.S. Gahlot, Advocates. versus HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishab Garg, Advocate (through V.C.) CRL.M.C. 1145/2026& CRL.M.A. 4555/2026& CRL.M.A. 4556/2026 KUSUM ROADWAYS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.S. Chauhan with Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Mr. Divyanhu and Mrs. A.S. Gahlot, Advocates. versus HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishab Garg, Advocate (through V.C.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The issue raised in both the petitions is similar and, therefore, both these matters have been taken up together. 2. Two separate complaints were filed against M/s Kusum Roadways for commission of offence under Section 138 read with Section 141 of 1881. 3. The complainant is M/s Hemkund Fill and Drive. 4. The grievance of the petitioner i.e. accused, is merely to the effect that when his right to cross-examine the complainant had been closed on 18.08.2025, he filed an ap