Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-24

KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD vs SUMIT SAWHNEY

Citation / case number
ARB.P.-2118/2025 2026:DHC:1678
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD
Respondent
SUMIT SAWHNEY
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 24.02.2026 ARB.P. 2118/2025 & I.A. 32259/2025 (For Delay 18 days in re-filing the petition) KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha and Mr. Aditya Prasad, Advocates. versus SUMIT SAWHNEY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashi Kant Upadhyay and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes that are stated to have arisen inter se the parties arising out of the Clause 32 of Car Finance Agreement dated 24.01.20242 and Clause 27 of Personal Loan Agreement dated 30.01.20253, which read as follows: “CAR FINANCE AGREEMENT 32. Arbitration: All disputes, differences and / or claim arising out of these presents or in any way touching or concerning the same or as to Personal Loan Agreement constructions, meaning or effect hereof or as to the rights and 1 Act 2 Car Finance Agreement 3 Personal Loan Agrement 27. Arbitration: All disputes, differe