Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-23

GAURAV ENTERPRISES vs GTB HOSPITAL & ANR.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-522/2026 2026:DHC:1592-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
GAURAV ENTERPRISES
Respondent
GTB HOSPITAL & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 05.02.2026 Judgment delivered on: 23.02.2026 Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~ + W.P.(C) 522/2026 & CM APPL. 2510/2026 GAURAV ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner Versus GTB HOSPITAL & ANR. ....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Singh, Sr Advocate with Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr. Harshit Singh, Ms. Hage Nanya, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr Sameer Vashisht, SC (Civil) and Ms Harshita Nathrani, Advocate. Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGMENT MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking the following reliefs: - “(i) Pass a Writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the Bid Document vide Bid Number GEM/2025/B/6787623 dated 14.10.2025. Signature Not Verified Signed By:MOHIT WP(C) No 522/2026 Page 1 of 17 Signing Date:23.02.2026 18:38 (ii) Pass a Writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the Bid Document vide BID No GEM/2025/B/7024513 dated 22.12.2025 (iii) Quash and set aside the Response dated 26.11.2025 issued by the Respondent No.1 (iv) Quash and set aside the Response dated 26.12.2025 issued by the Respondent No.1 (v) Direct the Respondent to incorporate a condition of required number of Security Supervisors in terms of Rule 2009 and remove the Harsh conditions. (vi) Direct the Respondent to consider the representation submitted on 7.11.2025 and 08.11.2025.” 2. The petitioner/Gaurav Enterprises is a registered partnership firm engaged in providing security surveillance and other manpower services to various Government Departments and Undertakings. 2.1. Respondent no. 1/GTB Hospital invit

GAURAV ENTERPRISES vs GTB HOSPITAL & ANR. · Niyam