EX-CONSTABLE VIRENDER SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16812/2022 EX-CONSTABLE VIRENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Virendra Singh Tomar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 09.02.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. REVIEW PET. 486/2025 1. Various arguments have been advanced by Mr. Farman Ali, learned CGSC for the respondents to press this review petition. 2. Mr Ali, inter alia, seeks to rely on Rule 9(2)1 of the Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules2. 3. These are aspects which have already been pleaded in the writ petition and the pleadings therewith and which have been taken into 1 9. Disablement due to Government service.— 2. If the Government servant is boarded out of Government service on account of his disablement, the quantum of disability pension for cent per cent disability shall be as specified in Schedule II hereto annexed and the quantum of disability pension for lower percentage of disability shall be proportionately lower in accordance with the provisions of Rule 8. 2 “the CCS (EOP) Rules” hereinafter Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAJEEV DHANKHAR Signing Date:11.02.2026 W.P.(C) 16812/2022 Page 1 of 6 18:27:21 consideration while passing our order. However, Mr. Farman Ali has additionally sought to place reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ajay Wahi3 to submit that, as the petitioner had sought voluntary retirement from service, he would not be entitled to disability pension in terms of the CCS (EOP) Rules. He places reliance on para 18 of the said decision, which reads as under: “18. Regulation 48 of the Regulations provides for disability pe