Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-12

DR. ANOOP GUPTA vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY

Citation / case number
CRL.REV.P.-96/2026 2026:DHC:1291
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
DR. ANOOP GUPTA
Respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12th February, 2026 CRL.REV.P. 96/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4884/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4885/2026 DR. ANOOP GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Mr. Aksveer S. Saggu and Mr. Manan Lohani, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. A complaint was filed against the petitioner herein. After being summoned, arguments on charge were heard and vide order dated 18.12.2023, the learned Magisterial Court directed the petitioner to be charged under Sections 23 and 25 of Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994 for violating Rules and Sections 4, 5 and 29 of said Act. 2. Such order was challenged by filing a revision petition before the learned Court of Sessions and such revision petition had been dismissed on 20.12.2025 and now the abovesaid revision petition has been filed by the same petitioner i.e. Dr. Anoop Gupta against the abovesaid orders. However, as per Section 438(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), if a revision has been filed by any person, either to the High Court