Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-17

DEEPA SINGH vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
CRL.A.-1725/2025 2026:DHC:1315
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
DEEPA SINGH
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 09.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 17.02.2026 CRL.A. 1725/2025 DEEPA SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kundan Kumar, Mr. Pranshu Kumar, Ms. Jaya Chandra, Ms. Divya Kundra, Mr. Madan Jha, Ms. Mahima Chaudhary and Ms. Prerna Jain, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with Inspector Ritesh. CRL.A. 1740/2025 &CRL.M.A. 38731/2025 ANURADHA @ CHIKU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kundan Kumar, Mr. Pranshu Kumar, Ms. Jaya Chandra, Ms. Divya Kundra, Mr. Madan Jha, Ms. Mahima Chaudhary and Ms. Prerna Jain, Advocates. versus STATE(NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with Inspector Ritesh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA JUDGMENT CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J. 1. These appeals under Section 12 of the Maharashtra 2. According to the learned counsel for the appellants/accused persons, the impugned order has been passed by the Link Judge in the absence of the Special Judge and hence invalid. Referring to Sections 5 and 6 of the MCOCA, it was argued that it is only the Special Court constituted under the MCOCA that has the power