Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-25

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6391 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6391 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6391 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6391 of 2025 Pallavi Srivastava .....Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Tausif Ahmad, Vijai Kumar Rai, G.A. A.F.R. Court No. - 85 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the revisionist and the counter affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party no.2 in the Court today are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The instant criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the revisionist with a prayer to quash/set aside the judgment and order dated 16th September, 2025 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court-II, Gorakhpur in Case No. Criminal Misc. Case No. 1165 of 2023 (Pallavi Srivastava VS. Tarun Prakash Srivastava), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., whereby the trial court has rejected the application of the revisionist under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of monthly maintenance allowance from the opposite party no.2 on the ground of jurisdicti

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6391 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam