Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-13

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 1279 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 1279 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 1279 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1279 of 2026 Arvind Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shyamu Shukla Court No. - 45 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Abhishek Singh, holding brief of Sri Shyamu Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 24.12.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No. 827 of 2025, under Sections 109, 352, 324(4) B.N.S., Police Station- Chiluatal, District- Gorakhpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to ulterior motive. It is next submitted that even according to the allegation made in the first information report, no offence whatsoever is disclosed against the petitioner and, as such, the impugned F.I.R. is liable to be quashed. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. as well as learned

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 1279 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam