CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 7160 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7160 of 2026 Ankit .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Pathak, Suresh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and peruse d the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the victim is major aged about 19 years and that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of B.N.S.S. has specifically stated that she was in relationship with the applicant for the last six months but when her father caught her, she stopped talking with the applicant. She has further stated that the applicant had called her at shamble, where he made pressure to make physical relations with her, thereafter had committed wrong with her and also prepared a video. He further submits that no video has been recovered and therefore the ingredients of Section 67-A of I.T. Act is not attracted in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant has further contended that in fact, the victim was in consensual relationship with