CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 7092 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7092 of 2026 Shakeel @ Umesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Harishchandra Yadav Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A for the State and peruse d the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the victim is major and that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 of B.NS.S. did not whisper about the applicant whereas the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of B.N.S.S. has also made allegation against the applicant. He further submits that there are material contradictions in the statements of the victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of B.N.S.S. Learned counsel next argued that the complicity of the applicant in commission of alleged offence is not made out. Learned counsel next argued that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate