CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 325 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 325 of 2026 Boby .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Chaturvedi, Mohd. Naushad, Vishesh Rajvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and peruse d the record. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the victim is major and she has stated in her statement under Section 183 of B.N.S.S., that the applicant took her to meet her mother and that the applicant had established physical relations, whereas the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 of B.N.S.S., has stated totally different version. It is thus contended that contradictory statements have been given by the victim which itself falsifies the allegations levelled against the applicant. Learned counsel further argued that no offence has been committed by the applicant and that the applicant has been falsely implicated in t