CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 2728 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2728 of 2026 Sujeet Kumar @ Sonu .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahesh Dwivedi, Ravi Kant Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that initially F.I.R. was lodged under Section 137(2) of B.N.S. and during the course of investigation, said section has been dropped and in its place Section 69 of B.N.S.S., has been incorporated. Learned counsel further argued the incident is alleged to have taken place on 05.12.2025, whereas the the F.I.R., has been lodged on 08.12.2025 without there being any plausible explanation of such delay. Learned counsel further argued that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 of B.N.S.S., did not level any allegation of inducement false promise of marriage, however the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 of B.N.S.S., has stated that the applicant since last one years on the pretext of marriage had es