CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 2014 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2014 of 2026 Priyanshu .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Neha Rani, Pawan Kumar Yadav, Satyvendra Singh Yadav Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. List revised. None appears either for the High Court Legal Service Committee, High Court Allahabad or for the Child Welfare Committee, Budaun. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the victim is major and that the victim had gone with the applicant out of her own free will and consent. He further submits that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S., has specifically stated that she had gone with the applicant out of her own free will at Mathura and had solemnised marriage in Goverdhan Temple. Similar version has also been stated by the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. Learned counsel further argued that the applicant and victim has