ARUN SURI vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16th February, 2026 + MISC. APPEAL (PMLA) 13/2026 ARUN SURI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shubail Farook & Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharrma, Special Counsel for ED. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 10454/2026-Exemption 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 10456/2026 2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 9 days in re-filing the appeal. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. 4. The application stands disposed of. MISC. APPEAL (PMLA) 13/2026 & CM APPL. 10455/2026 INTERIM RELIEF 5. The present appeal is filed under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [“PMLA”] assailing the impugned 6. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the subject property, that is, 255, Sainik Vihar, Pitam Pura, Delhi was never purchased by the appellant. The said property was purchased by the father of the appellant out of his own income in the year 1991 in the joint name of appellant and his own. The said p