ANIL KUMAR AND ORS vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 10th February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1134/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4471/2026 ANIL KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.V. Singh, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with ASI Pradeep Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Z.A. Ansari, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 320/2022 dated 09.08.2022, registered at P.S. Tigri, for commission of offences under Sections 324/323/341/34 IPC along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Charge-sheet has already been filed for commission of offences under Section 323/324/341/201/34 IPC. Charges are yet to be framed. 3. In the abovesaid FIR, there are three accused persons i.e. Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr. Manoj Solanki and Mr. Shivbir @ Ramu. 4. In the present petition, only one injured has been made party, whereas, as per the averments appearing in charge-sheet, the injuries were received by Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 1134/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:11.02.2026 15:16:36 three persons i.e. Mr. Deepak Kumar (respondent no. 2), Mr. Ajay and Ms. Sangeeta (wife of Ajay). 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there was some dispute between the neighbours and, with respect to the incident in question, a cross-FIR No.325/2022 at PS Tigri for commission of offences under Sections 323/341/34 IPC was also registered. In the cross-case, the injured was Mr. Anil Kumar and the accused are Mr. Deepak, Mr. Ajay, Ms. Sangeeta and Mr. Sunil. 6. Both the abovesaid cas