AARTI SHARMA vs STATE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 9th February, 2026 CRL.M.C. 1918/2023 & CRL.M.A. 7297/2023 AARTI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Swadha Gupta with Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Kamal, PS Tuglak Road. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is facing trial for commission of offences under Section 186/353/332/298 IPC, 1860. 2. Charges were framed by learned Trial Court on 12.08.2022 and such order was challenged by the petitioner by filing a Revision Petition. 3. Her main contention before the learned Revisional Court was to the effect that since accused had been charged for offence under Section 186 IPC also and cognizance for said offence could not have been taken in view of Section 195 Cr.P.C. as no separate complaint, as such, had been filed. It was contended that since all the offences were intrinsically interwoven and were inseparable, cognizance for the other offences was also not sustainable. 4. All such contentions did not find favour and resultantly, revision petition has been dismissed. 5. Such order is under challenge. 6.