ZIYADH SHAIT & ORS. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 22nd April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3063/2026 ZIYADH SHAIT & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Tripathi, Ms. Mandavi Pandey, Mr. Kunal Shahi, Mr. Sanjeet Mishra and Mr. Chandan, Advocates along with all the petitioners-in-person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State/R-1 Mohd. Sharique Khan, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.0228/2022 dated 05.02.2022, registered at Police Station Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Petitioner No. 1 got married to respondent No. 2 on 25.04.2019 in Delhi, as per Muslim rites and ceremonies. No child is born from the abovesaid wedlock. 3. However, on account of some matrimonial discord and temperamental differences, respondent No. 2 reported the matter to the police which resulted in registration of aforesaid FIR. Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 3063/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:24.04.2026 11:40:35 4. Fact, however, remains that in relation aforesaid matter, when parties were referred to Mediation, they were able to resolve all their disputes under the aegis of Delhi Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New, Delhi vide Mediation Order dated 22.09.2025. 5. Though charge-sheet has been filed but charges have yet not been ascertained. 6. Respondent No. 2 is present in person along with her counsel. Investigating officer is also present and duly identifies respondent No.2. 7. As per terms of settlement, respondent no. 2 is ready to a