WRIT - C No. 9570 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9570 of 2026 Canara Bank .....Petitioner(s) Versus M/S Shrimati Devi Ice & Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Mohan Asthana Counsel for Respondent(s) : Devansh Misra, Saumitra Dwivedi, Veerendra Kumar Shukla Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the petitioner in the leading writ petition, Sri Nitin Chandra Mishra and Sri Devansh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner in connected writ petition, Sri Shakti Swarup Nigam assisted by Sri Virendra Kumar Shukla for the respondent no. 1 in the leading writ petition and respondent no. 4 in the connected writ petition. 2. Contention of learned counsel for the bank is that the judgments and orders passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) cannot be sustained even for a moment, inasmuch as both the trial court have misconstrued the entire controversy and have proceeded to decide issues which were never before them. It is submitted that there were three borrowing units, namely, (a) M/s Munni Lal Ice and Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (Unit–I)