WRIT - C No. 888 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 888 of 2026 Badama Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Singh, Harish Chandra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 50 HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State - respondents. Sri Bupendra Kumar Tripathi appears on behalf of respondent no. 4. 2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 14.06.2023 and order dated 03.01.2025 by means of which the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have been finalised against the petitioner and the eviction order is passed against the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the entire proceedings have been initiated exparte against the petitioner, inasmuch as, after the death of the husband name of the wife, namely, the petitioner i.e. Badama Devi and seven sons have been recorded. He submits that no notice under Section 67 of the Code has been served upon the petitioner and even if there is a notice against the petitioner i.e. Bada