Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-15

WRIT - C No. 3494 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3494 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3494 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 3494 of 2026 Shiv Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Versus Tehsildar Tehsil Sadar Distt. Sultanpur And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No. 1. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent No. 1 to register the petitioner application dated 16.12.2025, under Chapter V Para 460 of Revenue Corut manual as a case and decide the proceeding as early as possible. 3. In the said case, the proceedings have been initiated at the behest of the villagers in which the petitioner is also one of the complainants. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability stating that the writ petition in the nature of mandamus for a direction to the authority to comply with the order passed U/S 67 of U.P. Revenue Code is not maintainable. It has further been stated that it is on the c

WRIT - C No. 3494 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam