Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-02

WRIT - C No. 3248 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3248 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3248 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 3248 of 2026 Nekram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey, Surya Prakash Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 5, Sri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel for the opposite party no.6 and Sri Surya Prakash Singh, learned Counsel for the opposite party no.9. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the revisional authority as well as the order dated 31.10.2019 passed by the ADM in Case No.D201610460070. 3. The facts in brief as emerge from the pleadings are that the predecessors of the opposite parties no.7 and 8 was granted lease on 11.01.1985. Subsequently, proceedings were initiated under Section 198(4) of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act by the Collector suo moto proposing to cancel the lease dated 11.01.1985. In the said proceedings, ultimately an or

WRIT - C No. 3248 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam