Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-10

WRIT - C No. 2689 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2689 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2689 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 2689 of 2026 Kiran Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Reependra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Challenge has been raised to the decision made by the empowered committee that has rejected the claim made by the petitioner under the 'Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana' (hereinafter referred to as "the Scheme"). 3. Undisputedly the petitioner's husband late Sanjay @ Sanjay Kumar died due to road accident on 25.11.2024. Relying on the Scheme enforced in the State under Government Order dated 02.03.2020, petitioner applied for the payment of compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/-. 4. Presently, the claim has been rejected on the solitary reason that the deceased did not own any agricultural land. No other reason has been assigned. At the same time, it has been recorded that neither the petitioner had any agricultural land nor was a farmer. 5. Clause 2 of the Scheme is extracted as und

WRIT - C No. 2689 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam