Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-13

WRIT - C No. 2089 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2089 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2089 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 2089 of 2026 Vijay Kumari .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Zoheb Ahmad, Faizal Hashmi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Shri Zoheb Ahmad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondent. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of the petitioner's claim under the scheme of Mukhymantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana by an order dated 21.01.2026 passed by respondent No.2 on the ground that the petitioner had made his claim belatedly after a period of 1 year and 11 days. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner relies upon the judgement passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Sarvesh Devi Vs. The State of U.P. and 3 others (Writ-C No.27527 of 2023). 4. In the said judgement, a Division Bench of this Court had heard the matter and had after cons

WRIT - C No. 2089 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam