WRIT - C No. 2043 of 2026 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 2043 of 2026 Rajrani .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of the petitioner's claim under the scheme of Mukhymantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana by an order dated October 21, 2024 passed by respondent No.2 on the ground that the petitioner had made his claim belatedly after a period of 45 days. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner relies upon the judgement passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Sarvesh Devi Vs. The State of U.P. and 3 others (Writ-C No.27527 of 2023). 4. In the said judgement, one of us (Prashant Kumar, J.) had heard the matter and had after considering the judgement in Gautam Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others reported in 2020 (11) ADJ 321 reiterated that the limit