Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-13

WRIT - C No. 2032 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2032 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2032 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 2032 of 2026 Vijay Kumar Bhatt .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Deptt. Of Political Pension Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has sought for the benefit of the Judgment and order dated 01.12.2025 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this High Court in relation to the benefit to be given to the petitioner under the Scheme of Rule 2(1) in Uttar Pradesh Lok Tantra Senani Samman Adhiniyam, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "Scheme". The writ petitioner further challenges the order dated 09.01.2026, wherein he has been accepted as a 'Loktantra Senani' but the benefit of the same has been made only prospectively and does not relate back to the date of coming into effect of the above Scheme. 3. Upon perusal of the Scheme, it does appear that the benefit is to flow from the date on which the

WRIT - C No. 2032 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam