Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-16

WRIT - C No. 12643 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 12643 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 12643 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12643 of 2026 Tata Projects Limited A Company .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sr. Advocate, Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. V.K. Singh, learned senior advocate had moved the writ petition on 3rd April, 2026. Paragraph 1 from order made that day is reproduced below. "1. Mr. V.K. Singh, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, three notices were given to his client in respect of work done and completion certificate issued. All were replied to. Without considering the replies, impugned order dated 23rd March, 2026 was made by respondent no.2 (the distribution company). Under challenge is said order and consequential prayer for restraint on invocation of the performance guarantee, which, to his client's information, has not yet been invoked. He seeks interference, interim at this stage." He had also handed up English translation of impugned order and other relevant documents. 2. Mr. Raj Mohan Upadhyay, l

WRIT - C No. 12643 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam