Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-02

WRIT - C No. 12469 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 12469 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 12469 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12469 of 2026 Bank Of Baroda .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhay PratapSingh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following relief:- "I. Issue the writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and interest of justice that this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to issue direction in the nature of mandamus to Respondent No. 2 to decide the pending application u/s 14 of SARFEASI Act 2002, Computer Case No. D202102030006969 (Bank of Baroda vs. M/s Patel Cold Storage & Ice Factory and Ors) expeditiously within short time bound period fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner/secured creditor that the scope of enquiry of the prescribed authority is limited to the secured assets in terms of area prescribed in the notification for that purpose and

WRIT - C No. 12469 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam