Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-06

WRIT - C No. 11865 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 11865 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 11865 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11865 of 2026 Nand Lal .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Singh, Sharad Chand Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Akanksha Gaur, C.S.C., Gautam Kumar Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Sharad Chand Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents; Ms. Akanksha Gaur, learned counsel for National Highway Authority of India and Shri Gautam Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for respondent no.1. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent authorities to either pay the compensation of the extra encroached land or return/ free the land of the petitioner which land was without acquisition, within stipulated period fix by this Hon'ble Court. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent authorities to consider/ decide objection dated 30.08.2023 and 08.02.2024 of the petitioner and issue

WRIT - C No. 11865 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam