Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-10

WRIT - C No. 11811 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 11811 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 11811 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11811 of 2026 Mohammad Arif .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Satish Kumar Pandey, Vineeta Devi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Sarveshwar Lal Srivastava Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Satish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sarveshwar Lal Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This Court on 28.03.2026, sought instructions. Today, instructions dated 08.04.2026 have been produced, which are taken on record and marked as Appendix ‘A’. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he does not propose to file any affidavit and he is in a position to argue the matter. Thus, with the consent of the parties, the petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner Mohd. Arif who was traveling by a passenger train from New Delhi to Gonda was holding a Ticket (no.99617253) and during the journey he accidentally fell down from the running train on 25.09.2015 at Colonalganj Railway Station and received serious injuries, pursuant whereto his left leg amp

WRIT - C No. 11811 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam