WRIT - C No. 11370 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11370 of 2026 Parvati Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Mishra, Vijay Pratap Singh, Vishnu Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Narendra Kumar Tiwari Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. The writ petition was moved on 25th March, 2026. Mr. Arun Mishra, learned advocate appearing for petitioner had submitted, prayer of his client was for issuance of mandamus to command respondent no.2 (the Executive Engineer) to generate one bill from inception of the connection, on the basis of final reading of 4468KWH units without adding fixed charge after line temporarily disconnected under clause 4.37(a) in Uttar Pradesh Electricity Supply Code, 2005 and without surcharge. Drawing attention to clause 4.37(a) he had submitted, the provision mandates the licensee to bill a consumer on minimum charges after a connection is temporarily disconnected. The licensee is to thereafter move for permanent disconnection. 2. Paragraphs-2 and 3 from order dated 25th March, 2026 are reproduced below. "2. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishr