Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-15

WRIT - C No. 11012 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 11012 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 11012 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11012 of 2026 Smt. Rajni Devi And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Aditya Bhushan Singhal, C.S.C., Ugrasen Kumar Pandey Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Yogesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents; and Shri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel for Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (for short, "YEIDA"). 2. The instant writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution, inter alia, the following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ of CERTIORARY to quash the impugned Notification No. Y.E.A/Bhulekh/1093/2025 dated 03.10.2025, published on 16.10.2025 in Amar Ujala contained as Annexure No. 4 for acquisition of the petitioners aforementioned land contained as Annexure No. 1, 2 and 3 being unconstitutional and, void ab initio, and repugnant and ultra vires the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 after calling the relevant records. (ii) Issu

WRIT - C No. 11012 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam