WRIT - C No. 10937 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10937 of 2026 Abhimanyu Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Chetan Chatterjee Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. With reference to earlier order dated 2nd April, 2026, Mr. Chetan Chatterjee, learned advocate appearing for respondent nos. 3 to 8 (the supply company) files affidavit dated 5th April, 2026 with copy served to Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, learned advocate appearing for petitioner. 2. Mr. Chatterjee relies on clauses 4.5 (d) and 4.6 (e)(ii) and (iii) in Uttar Pradesh Electricity Supply Code, 2005. He submits, petitioner had initially opted to establish the connection requiring his client to only charge supervision costs. Subsequently, he wanted the supply to be given by his client (the supply company). Hence, there was revised estimate. It has been challenged in the writ petition. The challenge is without merit. The writ petition be dismissed. 3. Clauses (a) to (d) from clause 4.5 are reproduced below. "4.5 Inspection by Licensee: The applicant along with the lice